April 6, 2025, Saint Barnabas Lutheran Church, Howard Beach, Queens, N.Y.
Six days before the Passover, Jesus came to Bethany …Then Mary took about a pint of pure nard, an expensive perfume; she poured it on Jesus’ feet and wiped his feet with her hair. And the house was filled with the fragrance of the perfume. John 12:1-3
This is one of four biblical accounts of a woman slouching toward Jesus to anoint his head or feet with very expensive oil.
Every time I heard these stories discussed in Sunday church school, they were quickly divided into two categories:
One, how perceptive is the woman – in this case, Mary – to recognize Jesus as the Son of God; and, two, how shortsighted are the disciples (namely Judas) to look upon the act as a waste of money.
Whether it’s a waste or not, the oil with which Jesus is anointed is big money. Mary is pouring a year’s income worth of oil on Jesus. Judas, who sees many other ways the money could be used – including his own purse – is appalled. But Judas, the sly old grifter, hides his greed by complaining the money could have been given to the poor.
Jesus’ response is quoted in many legislative committees seeking to maintain a low minimum wage, or cut back on programs to supplement the income of families living below the poverty line, or redirecting taxes to benefit the rich at the expense of the poor.
“You always have the poor with you,” Jesus said, “but you don’t always have me.” (Jn 12:8)
We know, of course, that it’s ridiculous to assume Jesus is saying the poor are always here so we need to strategize how much money we should spend on them.
We know these walked among the poor, ate with the poor, cured their illnesses, and at all times identified with the poor.
Also, writes Lindsey S. Jodrey of Princeton Seminary, we may be interpreting Jesus’ words wrong.
“There’s a funny thing in ancient Greek, Jodrey points out. “Sometimes the present indicative form of a word (which just indicates or states something — such as “you always have the poor with you”) matches the present imperative form of the word which commands you to do something … In this passage, which is translated ‘you will have’ can be indicative or imperative … it looks exactly the same. So maybe we should read Jesus’ statement not as an indication of the way things are, but as a command: Have the poor with you always. Or Keep the poor among you always.”
This is an important distinction because, God knows, the poor are with us, even in the richest country in the world.
According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, there are too many hungry children in our nation.
* 47.4 million people live in food-insecure households.
* 12.2 million adults live in households with very low food security.
* 7.2 million children live in food-insecure households in which children, along with adults, were food insecure.
* 841,000 children (1.2 percent of the Nation's children) live in households in which one or more child experienced very low food security.
In this passage, Jesus points out that the oil had been purchased “so that she might keep it for the day of my burial.” (Jn 12:7)
This adds a helpful dimension to what we might regard as a scene of extraordinary intimacy between a Palestinian man and woman. But maybe it’s not that, we tell ourselves, because preparing Jesus for his burial is a holy portent of what he will face in Jerusalem to bring his redemptive ministry to a close.
That was the approach I expected the Rev. James Martin, S.J., to take when he referred to the anointing stories during a recent lecture about his book Jesus: A Pilgrimage.
Instead, Martin asked: “Was Jesus turned on?”
Given that Jesus was equal parts God and human, it’s a fair question. And the answer is unavoidable: yes, no doubt. It’s one of the inescapable realities of Incarnational Theology.
If Jesus the man was tempted in all things, his human hormones would have vied fiercely with his God side. As the woman’s shining face presses moistly toward him and he feels her warm breath on his weary feet, the God in him exults, “Bless you, dear child, for your chaste and pious devotion.” The human in him chokes back the words, “Come here often?”
It’s difficult for most of us to think of Jesus as being thoroughly human as well as wholly God. We can see the scriptural evidence that Jesus laughed, cried, hungered, enjoyed wine, and occasionally ate to satiation. Father Martin also points out that Jesus the Human must have suffered headaches, painful sunburn, blisters on his feet, episodes of projectile vomiting and violent diarrhea. He may also – since God is not known to have made a special dispensation for him – that he was sexually stimulated..
I may be crossing a line in stating my assumptions about just how human Jesus was. Indeed, I fear Mrs. Montfort, my childhood Sunday school teacher, would have been aghast to realize Jesus’ underarm odor carried the same pheromones as Mr. Montfort. But these are the challenging veracities of Incarnational Theology.
It’s difficult to face these realities and many congregations never acknowledge them. This may be one reason millennials (adults born after 1980) are leaving the church in droves. The Jesus we have tried to present to them is a two-dimensional Barbie Doll replete with pious promises but bereft of the human flesh that makes him credible as God incarnate. If Jesus didn’t battle with his hormones and his headaches the same way we do, how can we be sure that God really understands what it’s like to be us?
It is undeniably difficult for many Christians to understand the union of body and soul. For one thing, it’s usually the body that causes people to sin so we try to keep it as far away from our souls as possible.
This diminution of our physicality crops up in unexpected ways. A lot of us don’t like to think of our pastors, priests, nuns, or bishops as real humans because we expect them to be spiritual creatures.
When a pope gets sick, for example, it’s hard for the faithful to know how to pray. In the 1970s, when Pope Paul VI had his prostate removed, the actual procedure – whether retropubic or perineal – was too horrible to contemplate for a pope. Realizing the awkwardness of portraying the pope as a mere man with mere man maladies, the Vatican released as few details as possible.
In contrast, Pope Francis – who came near to death during his recent hospitalization – allowed the doctors to tell us everything about his illness, including the respiratory crisis when he inhaled his own vomit. In many ways, seeing the Pope as an old man struggling with illness and facing his mortality brought him closer to those who follow his lead.
An awareness of the humanity of Jesus greatly expands our appreciation of the Gospel stories.
Father James Martin does us a great service by reminding us that Jesus was human and “tempted in all things,” just as we are tempted. To know this is to know Jesus better, because we come to realize that Jesus knows what we go through every day: our pains and discomforts, our fears, our frustrations, and our perpetual temptations.
But, as theologians have also been reminding us for two millennia, Jesus differs from us in one all-important way: he never succumbed to temptation. He was a human without sin, a human who never strayed from God Creator or rejected God’s will for him.
That makes Jesus unique among all of God’s creation.
Jesus struggled every day with the same temptations that that threaten to drown us.
And in renewing our awareness of his humanness, we may find ourselves more powerfully drawn to his God-ness, and the eternal font of unconditional love.
It also puts our own humanness and fleshly temptations in a clearer perspective.
C.S. Lewis wrote in Mere Christianity, “The sins of the flesh are bad, but they are the least bad of all sins.”
Lewis wrote, “All the worst pleasures are purely spiritual: the pleasure of putting other people in the wrong, of bossing and patronizing and spoiling sport, and back-biting, the pleasures of power, of hatred. For there are two things inside me, competing with the human self which I must try to become. They are the Animal self, and the Diabolical self. The Diabolical self is the worse of the two. That is why a cold, self-righteous prig who goes regularly to church may be far nearer to hell than a prostitute.”
Of course, Lewis added, it’s better to be neither.
Jesus encouraged us by his own example to enjoy the pleasures of the flesh, if not its sins.
If that helps us become more generously loving and less diabolically priggish, we owe it to a deeper understanding of Jesus’ human side. The side that was more like us than we have dared imagine.