Tuesday, January 7, 2025

Baptism of Jesus



January 12, 2025, St Barnabas Lutheran Church, Howard Beach, Queens, N.Y.

Can you remember your baptism?  Who was there? Who said, “I baptize thee…”? What was done later to celebrate your new membership in the family of Christ?

Certainly the majority of Lutherans were infants when they were baptized by the sprinkling of water on their tiny heads. If this was your experience you probably don’t remember your baptism. Some Lutherans, of course, are baptized later in life and, for them, the memory is a blessing.

As a former Baptist, the very idea of baptism tingles all my chords of memory.

Back when I thought Baptists had first dibs on the Kingdom of Heaven, I was convinced that the baptism of Jesus offered a model of what baptism should be.

He was as believing adult.

He was dunked fully in the river. (We have no real evidence of that, of course, but I challenge you to find a Baptist who doesn’t believe it.

In fact, we can even surmise that all the people who came to John’s baptistry to repent their sins were adults.

That’s about all the evidence Baptists need to declare baptism should be for believing adults who knew they were born again. Years ago, I remember the general secretary of the Baptist World Alliance, the late Gerhard Claas – a German who somehow missed being a Lutheran – declare, “I see no infants baptized in my bible!” That’s debatable, of course, because scripture tells us of whole families being baptized. But Baptists held firm to their beliefs, including the notion that Jesus turned water into grape juice.

There are other groups who believe in adult baptism, and it should be noted that this position was not taken lightly. Henry VIII burned anabaptists at the stake. Believers risked their lives to dunk.

Martha and I were both born into infant baptizing churches. Martha was baptized in the Roman Catholic Church in Havana, Cuba, and I was baptized by Presbyterians in Morrisville, N.Y. But as adults we fell among Baptists and thought it good to be re-baptized. 

Over the years as an American Baptist pastor, Martha baptized scores of adults, fully dunking them in church baptistries. One skill she has that you may never witness is her ability to stand facing abnormally tall people, lean them over backwards into the water, and return them to a standing position. It’s a marvel of physics. And a miracle that she never drowned anyone.

Needless to say, our views of Christian baptism have evolved. And I must say that the first time I saw Martha baptize an infant and carry the baby up the church aisles to present her to a Lutheran congregation, I was deeply moved.

Too, we now recognize that the Holy Spirit was powerfully present when we were baptized as infants and there was no need to be re-baptized.

As a member of the World Council of Churches staff I attended a meeting with Latin American Pentecostals in Costa Rica. An intensely evangelical group, Pentecostals have been aggressive in bringing lapsed Catholics into their fold. But a Pentecostal pastor reported that his church does not re-baptize converts who were baptized as infants in Catholic parishes. “The presence of the Holy Spirit is for all time,” he said. “The Holy Spirit does not expire."

For Martin Luther, baptism was an essential step to salvation. We’ve read his words in his Small Catechism: “Baptism works forgiveness of sins, rescues from death and the devil, and gives eternal salvation to all who believe this, as the words and promises of God declare.”

How can water do such great things?

“Certainly not just water,” Luther wrote, “but the word of God in and with the water does these things, along with the faith which trusts this word of God in the water. For without God’s word the water is plain water and no Baptism. But with the word of God it is a Baptism, that is, a life-giving water, rich in grace, and a washing of the new birth in the Holy Spirit, as St. Paul says in Titus, chapter three: “He saved us through the washing of rebirth and renewal by the Holy Spirit, whom He poured out on us generously through Jesus Christ our Savior, so that, having been justified by His grace, we might become heirs having the hope of eternal life. This is a trustworthy saying.” (Titus 3:5–8)

Luther declares, “St. Paul writes in Romans chapter six: ‘We were therefore buried with Him through baptism into death in order that, just as Christ was raised from the dead through the glory of the Father, we too may live a new life’” (Rom. 6:4)

The importance of baptism is founded on the fact that Jesus, who was without sin, demonstrated its importance by being baptized himself.

We know the familiar paintings that depict this scene: John standing awkwardly before Jesus protesting he was not worthy to baptize him; Jesus insisting that he do it anyway.

It’s worth noting, then, that John is strangely missing from Luke’s account. Why? 

Karoline Lewis, Professor and the Marbury E. Anderson Chair of Biblical Preaching at Luther Seminary in Saint Paul, Minnesota, says the answer is hidden is verses 3:18-20 that the lectionary omits. John is in jail. He has spoken truth to power and King Herod doesn’t like it. So he throws the Baptist into a dark hole and throws away the key.

So if John didn’t baptize Jesus, who did?

Of course it was John. The three other Gospels state this explicitly. Mark, the writer of the oldest Gospel, writes, “In those days Jesus came from Nazareth of Galilee and was baptized by John in the Jordan. And just as he was coming up out of the water, he saw the heavens torn apart and the Spirit descending like a dove on him. And a voice came from heaven, ‘You are my Son, the Beloved; with you I am well pleased.”

That’s the old, old story we know so well.

But Professor Lewis believes it is important that we acknowledge John’s absence in this passage in Luke. 

“While John had a major role in the first chapters of the Gospel, including“ the story of his mother and father, his birth, his relationship to Jesus,” she writes, “now that Jesus will be baptized, it’s just Jesus, and there will be no confusing the two … John’s baptism is just with water. But Jesus? Well, that’s with the Holy Spirit and with fire (think Acts 2).

Professor Mitzi J. Smith, J. Davison Philips Professor of New Testament at Columbia Theological Seminary, Decatur, Georgia, also sees hidden meanings in Luke’s version of the story.

“Before Jesus has done anything,” she writes, “before he begins his public ministry in Luke, the voice from heaven publicly announces, ‘I am well pleased with you’ (3:22b). The only thing Jesus has done so far is to humble himself by submitting to be baptized by a man who describes himself as unworthy to untie Jesus’ sandals and who has lived in the margins of society.

Perhaps this demonstrates God giving value to the lowliest in a society where wealth is concentrated in the top 1–2 percent. Maybe this God gives value, purpose, belonging, and a sense of dignity and worth to persons born into social statuses relegated to the bottom of a society. This divine affirmation and confirmation will allow Jesus to unapologetically speak truth to power, to stand in the midst of hostile crowds, and to stand firm before religious and political leaders.”

Thus Jesus’ earthly ministry begins on a high note, with God placing him among the most common people of his time while instilling him with a power and authority that will change the world forever.

And it all begins in water, that is, “a life-giving water, rich in grace, and a washing of the new birth in the Holy Spirit.”

As preachers all over the world are admonishing each of us today, 

“Remember your baptism.”

Come on in. The waters are fine. 

3 comments:

  1. I am astounded that Karoline Lewis [proclaiming herself as a theologian, speaker, teacher, author, and preacher and furthermore holds degrees from Northwestern University (B.A.), Luther Seminary (M. Div.), and Emory University (Ph. D., New Testament Studies and Homiletics)] could state that John was in jail at the time of Jesus' baptism.
    It is easy to recognize that in Chapter 3 Luke is giving a synopsis of John's mission. A call to repentance, baptism, and to herald Jesus as the Lamb of God.
    Ms. Lewis obviously does not comprehend that Luke Chapter 3 is not written in chronological order but is divided into three distinct topics. First John the Baptist's mission, secondly the Baptism of Jesus, and thirdly going back in time to the genealogy of Jesus.
    The following passage in John Chapter 3 refutes Ms. Lewis' hypothesis. John 3:22After this, Jesus and His disciples went into the Judean countryside, where He spent some time with them and baptized. 23Now John was also baptizing at Aenon near Salim, because the water was plentiful there, and people kept coming to be baptized. 24(For John had not yet been thrown into prison.).

    Martin Luther muses “Baptism works forgiveness of sins, rescues from death and the devil, and gives eternal salvation to all who believe this, as the words and promises of God declare.”
    Let us not think that undergoing the ritual of sprinkling or dunking in water magically forgives sins and endues one with the benefits outlined by Luther.
    Rather, baptism represents death: death to self. Just as the antediluvian world was drowned in water killing off an evil degenerate humanity along with the Nephilim while only saving the righteous, God-fearing Noah and the seven of his family.
    Likewise, Jesus' baptism represents a pivotal turning point is his life.
    It was the death of Jesus the artisan (carpenter/stonemason) of Nazareth, the death of any earthly hopes and dreams a young man may have had for himself. It was the point at which he vowed to live a life totally dedicated to the Will of God his Father even though he knew it would end with death on the Cross.

    Similarly, we must die to self, eliminating all dreams, hopes, and
    goals for earthy things and devote our life praying that we fulfill Gods' plan for us in furtherance of his Kingdom.
    St. Paul comments in Romans 6:4Therefore we have been buried with him by baptism into death, so that, just as Christ was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father, so we too might walk in newness of life.

    Obviously, an infant is not capable of make this decision, it is only when an individual is capable of discarding his own wants, hopes, and desires and devoting his life to Christ that he can publicly display this commitment through the ritual of Baptism.

    What Lutherans, Catholics and other denominations call infant baptism is in reality a dedication ceremony, i.e. public commitment. on the part of the parents and godparents to bring the child up in the knowledge of the Lord and be part of the Christian community.

    It is perplexing that the Catholic and numerous Protestant denominations hold fast to their own dogma/doctrines regarding baptism rather than rely on what Scripture states.

    Trompeter bei der Grundsteinlegung der St. Pauls Evangelical Lutheran Church Rye Brook, NY

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ms. Mitzi J. Smith, despite her accolade as Davison Philips Professor of New Testament at Columbia Theological Seminary, Decatur, Georgia states in her Commentary on Luke 3:15-17, 21-22 thusly: “He will be called son of God” (klēthēsetai, huios theou, Luke 1:35). Later in Luke, he is also called the prophet of the Most High and next, he is called Jesus (1:76; 2:21)
    Ms. Smith, despite holding a PhD in New Testament from Harvard University does not seem to grasp Luke 1:76And child, you will be called a prophet of the Most High, for you will go before the Lord to prepare His ways.
    This passage is spoken by Zechariah regarding his son, John (not Jesus as Ms. Smith implies).
    Ms. Smith goes on to claim: During the first century, many Jewish persons in Judea and Galilee had been enslaved by Rome. There is scant evidence of Jews being enslaved during the time of Jesus or prior to the Great Jewish revolt of 66AD and the subsequent siege of Jerusalem 70AD.
    Paying tribute (taxes) to Rome cannot be considered enslavement. Do you, Mr. Jenks, or Ms. Smith consider yourselves being enslaved to America since you must pay tribute to our government? Did the Israelites consider themselves enslaved considering they were required to tithe?

    Newsflash, tribute does not equal enslavement!




    ReplyDelete

  3. Let us let Scripture interpret Scripture. Pray for understanding of Scripture and pray for discernment among the many voices proclaiming and preaching their deliberations on Scripture.
    Martin Luther was a proponent of Sola Scriptura. Yet it seems many of today's preachers, teachers, and so-called Bible experts with advanced degrees in theology, divinity, etc. regard their denomination's doctrines, dogma, and tenets above what Scripture clearly states.

    It is my fervent desire that folks would immerse themselves in the Holy Scriptures, feeding on the Word of God daily. Hearing a 20-minute sermon on Sunday morning is a mere serving of hors d'oeuvres. We feed the body daily (often three times a day), let likewise feed the soul as frequently.

    Random thoughts from an avid reader of Scripture and trumpeter at the laying of the cornerstone of St. Paul's Evangelical Lutheran Church Rye Brook, NY.

    Afterthoughts
    I respect Mitzi J Smith regarding her work in advancing the rights of women, equality, and stance on social issues.
    Her writings on Scripture, however, are bizarre and boarder on the heretical. For instance, she states in her Critical Agentive Reading of Biblical Texts: Prioritizing Questions, Context, and Justice:
    ...Jesus’s dehumanization began in the womb of his enslaved birth
    mother, Mary.” Luke 1:48For He has looked with favor on the humble state of His servant. From now on all generations will call me blessed.
    NB, Mary is calling herself a servant of the Lord. Not the slave of a human master. (one does not need several post graduate degrees to understand that sentence which can easily be comprehended by a fifth grader).
    ... I did not presume that the Samaritan woman was a promiscuous woman (the text does not say so either, but many readers “see” what they assume). I also refused to read the statement attributed to the Samaritan woman that Jesus “told her everything that she ever did” as if it referred to her sexual life and was negative.
    OK, five husbands and now living in sin with a sixth. If that is not promiscuous then tell me what is.
    OK, "REFUSE to READ." is Mitzi inferring that we can blot out passages, ignore Chapters and tear out pages of Scripture we do not like or agree with?
    ..What is living water? Does the Hebrew Bible/Old Testament have anything to say about living water? A review of the Hebrew Bible led me to understand living water as free-flowing water from a
    natural source (see Zech 14:8; Jer 2:13; 17:13). Ms. Smith here is referring to the living water Jesus spoke about with the Samaritan woman at the well.
    Newsflash Mitzi! The understanding of "living water" is given in John 7:38“He who believes in Me, as the Scripture said, ‘From his innermost being will flow rivers of living water.’” 39But this He spoke of the Spirit, whom those who believed in Him were to receive; for the Spirit was not yet given, because Jesus was not yet glorified.
    ...Jesus’s birth status as an enslaved child is relevant because it
    means that God did not spare God’s own son.
    I am indeed bewildered as to why Ms. Smith states Jesus was an enslaved child.
    Question? Enslaved by whom? Joseph was a working man making his livelihood as a carpenter and Mary a stay-at-home housewife and mother.
    Mitzi, are you making up Scripture as you go along or trying to astound us with your own fanciful hypotheses?

    Mic dropped

    ReplyDelete