Wednesday, April 30, 2025

Peter, Do You Love Me?


May 4, 2025, First Lutheran Church of Throggs Neck, Bronx, N.Y.

Amid the hundreds of memes posted last week about the late Pope Francis, there is a video of the Pontiff preaching to a crowd in the Philippines.

Reading from the same Gospel we’ve read this morning, the Pope quoted Jesus’ query of Peter:

“Do you love me?”

He paused and the crowd to shouted in unison, “Yes!”

Realizing the crowd meant him, the Pope laughed and said, “Thank you very much.”

It’s also interesting that the Pope chose a passage from John that challenges Peter to renew his devotion to Jesus and his commitment to a life that will lead inevitably to the cross.

Just a few passages earlier, Peter had declared his complete allegiance to Jesus, and insisted he would be with him to the death.

Then came Jesus’ arrest in the Garden, and Peter cowered from the danger. Three times he had a chance to stand by his Lord, and three times Peter denied even knowing him.

It was a humiliating moment for the swaggering disciple who Jesus dubbed “the Rock” and gave the keys to his kingdom. It looked like Peter was on a stellar path in the apostle business.

Then Peter’s cocky crowing was stifled by the crowing of the cock.

When the seven disciples gathered on the shore of Lake Tiberias, Peter was probably still stinging from his loss of prestige. Whether by design or chance, the resurrected Jesus appeared first to Mary Magdalene, not the bearer of the kingdom’s keys. Was that intended as a message to Peter or was it because Mary was an earlier riser?

Whatever the reason, Peter’s lofty position among the apostles was gone, and the dramatic change in all the apostle’s lives made them wonder what the future might hold. 

This, of course, happens to all of us in times of sudden change. The loss of a job, the loss of a loved one, the loss of our health, all may mark a time when our lives have changed and we don’t know what to do next, we don’t know what the rest of our lives will be like. 

The seven disciples on the shore may be struggling with that uncertainty. It may be that Peter was looking for something from his old life before he met Jesus, something familiar, something he knew he was good at.

“I am going fishing,” he announced. And the other six jumped at the idea. “We will go with you.”

But if they expected to find comfort in the old habits, they were disappointed. These old hands at the fishing nets bobbled in the boat all night and caught nothing.

By daybreak when they pulled ashore, a man stood on the beach to welcome them. 

“Children, you have no fish, have you?” I have to believe that the man was smiling in amusement.

The disciples didn’t recognize the man, although his next suggestion must have rung some bells.

“Cast the net to the right side of the boat, and you will find some.”

And they did find some, of course, so many fish they couldn’t haul in the net.

That was enough to clear the mental fog for John, the disciple Jesus loved. “It is the Lord!” he exclaimed to Peter. And Peter’s reaction was to jump into the sea. 

When Peter had hauled the heavy net ashore, Jesus said, “Come and have breakfast.”

On the shore was a charcoal fire cooking fish and bread.

It’s unclear to me whether Jesus prepared the fire and food himself, or whether he took advantage of an existing fire on the beach. I like to think Jesus was the pitmaster because it’s so consistent with his role of humble servitude. We do know that “Jesus came and took the bread and gave it to them, did the same with the fish.”

By this time all the disciples realized it was Jesus who hosted this little breakfast. This, according to John, was the third time Jesus had appeared to the disciples after he was raised from the dead.

When breakfast was over, it was to Peter that Jesus went.

The ensuing conversation was brutal.

“Simon son of John, do you love me more than these?” He said to him, “Yes, Lord; you know that I love you.” Jesus said to him, “Feed my lambs.”  

A second time he said to him, “Simon son of John, do you love me?” He said to him, “Yes, Lord; you know that I love you.” Jesus said to him, “Tend my sheep.”  

He said to him the third time, “Simon son of John, do you love me?” Peter felt hurt because he said to him the third time, “Do you love me?” And he said to him, “Lord, you know everything; you know that I love you.” 

Jesus said to him, “Feed my sheep.  Very truly, I tell you, when you were younger, you used to fasten your own belt and to go wherever you wished. But when you grow old, you will stretch out your hands, and someone else will fasten a belt around you and take you where you do not wish to go.” [Jn 21:15-18]

Professor Jennifer Garcia Bashaw, of Campbell University in Buies Creek, North Carolina, believes Jesus had a reason for asking Peter three times if he loves him.

“This frame of the scene ties up several narrative threads,” she writes. “First, we have a reversal of Peter’s denial and shame as Jesus prompts a triple confession of Peter’s love set at a charcoal fire like the first. The words for “love” in this passage alternate between agapao and phileo, but the current consensus in scholarship says that these words are not speaking to different types or qualities of love but are, rather, interchangeable. John seems to favor alternating words for variety in this passage because he does the same with the words for sheep and lambs.”

Also, Professor Bashaw writes, “The Good Shepherd discourse from chapter 10 finds new life in Jesus’ words to Peter. Now, instead of Jesus being the shepherd who loves the sheep, Peter is being asked about loving the shepherd and then is given the task of tending to, or grazing, the sheep. Just as Jesus’ love for his sheep led to him giving up his life, Peter’s path will also lead to death as he follows Jesus and cares for his sheep.”

We may breathe a sigh of relief for Peter that his proper place of leadership among the apostles has been restored. It’s also sobering because we know Peter’s discipleship will lead to his own crucifixion, traditionally upside down on a cross in Rome.

Years ago, when Pope Francis preached this passage from John to a congregation of Filipinos, I think he was reminding all Christians of the potential costs of declaring our love for Jesus.

Jesus is reminding us we are all shepherds, and we are all called to express our love by feeding his sheep.

By assuring that the structures of society and government protect the poor and feed the hungry.

By assuring that the structures of society and government see the importance of all residents, that all are valuable and essential human beings, regardless of their race, religion, age, citizenship, sexuality, or physical or mental disability.

By assuring that the structures of society and government provide the due process and legal protections for residents who are not citizens.

By assuring that the structures of society and government provide safety, justice, and equal opportunity for all residents to pursue the happiness to which they are entitled.

These are the sheep Jesus expects us to protect as an expression of our love for him. There may be a cost to this discipleship. But when Jesus asks, “Do you love me,” what else can our answer be but, “Lord, you know that I love you.”

Amen.

Friday, April 25, 2025

Doubts are Ants in Your Pants (Buechner)

 


April 27, 2025, First Lutheran Church, Throggs Neck, Bronx, N.Y. Reprised from an earlier post.

Then Jesus said to Thomas, “Put your finger here and see my hands. Reach out your hand and put it in my side. Do not doubt but believe.” John 20:27

I’ve known some serious doubters in my time and quite often I’ve been one of them.

I’ve also known some frivolous doubters who simply wish to distinguish themselves from silly simpletons of faith. They think Christians view God as a white bearded misogynist who sits on a cloud behind pearly gates, glaring at Muslims and grumbling ominously about same sex marriages. 

Those who don’t believe this god exists are welcome to their atheism, and they would include most church attenders.

Some doubters, however, are merely intellectual posers. They find it cool to be an agnostic or atheist. It makes them look smarter than their church going friends and it declares their emancipation from pious, controlling parents.

And there are doubters who doubt out of laziness, either because they don’t wish to trouble themselves with deep questions about the meaning of life, or because it gives them an excuse to stay in bed on Sunday mornings.

But I’m not thinking about bush league doubters. I’m thinking about persons whose doubt is on steroids, mounting daily, cramping the synapses of their frontal cortex, torturing them with illusions of insight while shrinking their cerebral testicles.

For doubters such as this, Thomas is the patron saint. 

His was not the kind of doubt that enabled him to sleep late or feel superior to his believing friends.

His was a throbbing doubt, and the toothy grins of his fellow disciples tortured him. 

What did Thomas want to believe more than anything else? 

That Jesus was alive.

What did he know could never happen? 

That a dead man could return to life. 

While his friends snickered, he continued to mourn.

Many of us share the pain of knowing a loved one is gone and can never return. The pain may fade slightly over the years, but it never goes away.

As is often the case in social media, I have a Facebook friend I’ve never met. She is a Baptist minister and prison chaplain who contacted me at the National Council of Churches to ask the council’s help in securing clemency for a death row inmate. Interventions from the Council and from the Pope did no good and the prisoner was executed, but I remained in touch with the chaplain in Facebook.

Shortly after the execution of the prisoner, the chaplain learned her young daughter had a particularly dangerous form of cancer. The mother decided to share her pain with her Facebook friends. For months, I was among those who prayed and laughed and wept as this child’s prognosis rose and fell. At first it seemed the chemotherapy was working. Then the cancer returned, and the doctors said one of her legs must be amputated. This was a tough decision for the mother of a child who wanted to be a dancer, but there was still hope the operation would save her life. Nevertheless, a year ago, this beautiful little girl died.

Not long ago, my friend placed this message on Facebook:

Not sure why I want my FB world to know, but I just need to share. I hurt. Being a bereaved mother sucks. I miss her smile, her crystal blue eyes and knowing how she would be thinking about the world. Not worth listing all the things I miss ... because it is every single thing. I know it isn’t realistic, but it doesn't stop my heart from screaming, “Please come home ... please ... I need you back.”

While his glib friends were smiling, Thomas the Doubter was feeling a pain akin to this. “Please come back home, Jesus, please, I need you back,” But as any sensible human being must, he would have added, “I know it isn’t realistic.” He doubted. And so would we.

Doubt is not a trifling thing. Doubt is pain. Doubt is facing the fact that we can never have what we want most, what we need most. Doubt is the ultimate darkness. It’s ironic that we have been raised to think of Thomas as a man of little faith, when in fact his doubts were logical. “Unless I see the mark of the nails in his hands, and put my finger in the mark of the nails and my hand in his side,” he said, “I will not believe.” It was a cry of agony, not arrogance.

In 2008, the National Council of Churches was observing the 100th anniversary of the founding of its predecessor organization, the Federal Council of Churches in the USA.

As webpage editor, I was assigned to develop a monthly series of “ecumenical moments” that highlighted special events in the history of the Council. 

I looked for leaders and events that called attention to the special ministries of the Council. There was Arthur Flemming, a Republican member of President Eisenhower’s cabinet who was an eloquent advocate for Civil Rights; Harold Stassen and J. Irwin Miller, often touted as men who should have been president of the United States; Cynthia Wedel, a pioneering advocate for women’s rights and a member of President Kennedy’s Commission on the Status of Women; Eugene Carson Blake, who linked arms with Martin Luther King, Jr., on the 1963 “I have a dream” march with Washington.

All were persons of great faith and all were activists for peace, equal rights, and justice.

But as I leafed through the pages of Outlook, a magazine published by the Council from 1950 to 1953, I realized I was missing an important ministry not always associated with the National Council of Churches: evangelism.

I was surprised to discover the Council had a director of evangelism in the early fifties. He was a fiery, energetic preacher named Charles Templeton, who happened to be a good friend of Billy Graham. A long article in Outlook described Templeton’s homiletical zeal and remarkable success in winning souls for Jesus.

Yes! I thought. Perfect! What better example of the Council’s little known evangelical side? Was Templeton still alive? Was he still in the evangelism biz? I jumped on my computer and began searching for him.

I didn’t find Charles, but I found his son and gave him a call.

“I was just reading an old article about your dad’s years as evangelist for the National Council of Churches,” I said.

“Oh,” he replied, sounding interested.

“Is your dad still around?”

“He died in 2001.”

“I’m sorry to hear that.”

“You knew, right?”

“What?”

“You knew he became an atheist and left the Council?”

Whoops.

So much for the NCC evangelism story.

Digging a little further, I discovered Templeton had written a book in 1996, Farewell to God, My Reasons for Rejecting the Christian Faith.

The book includes an account of his encounter with his old pal, Billy Graham.

\In the course of our conversation I said, “But, Billy, it’s simply not possible any longer to believe, for instance, the biblical account of creation. The world was not created over a period of days a few thousand years ago; it has evolved over millions of years. It’s not a matter of speculation; it’s a demonstrable fact.” “I don’t accept that,” Billy replied.

Charles Templeton had become a man of doubt. And he was no facile doubter. He was a doubter on steroids.

But, like Thomas, his doubts brought him pain.

Lee Strobel, the Christian journalist and author of The Case for Faith, recounts an interview he had with Templeton when he was in his 80s.

Strobel asked the aging atheist to update his thoughts about Jesus. Templeton’s response surprised him.

“He was,” Templeton began, “the greatest human being who has ever lived. He was a moral genius. His ethical sense was unique. He was the intrinsically wisest person that I’ve ever encountered in my life or in my readings. His commitment was total and led to his own death, much to the detriment of the world. What could one say about him except that this was a form of greatness?”

“Well, yes, he is the most important thing in my life ... I know it may sound strange, but I have to say , I adore him.  Everything good I know, everything decent I know, everything pure I know, I learned from Jesus. Yes. And tough! Just look at Jesus. He castigated people. He was angry. People don’t think of him that way, but they don’t read the Bible. He had a righteous anger. He cared for the oppressed and exploited. There’s no question that he had the highest moral standard, the least duplicity, the greatest compassion, of any human being in history. There have been many other wonderful people, but Jesus is Jesus.

“In my view,” he declared, “he is the most important human being who has ever existed.”

That’s when Templeton uttered the words I never expected to hear from him. “And if I may put it this way,” he said as his voice began to crack, “I miss him!”

What happens to the doubters when they near the end of their lives?

Thomas does not reappear in the canonical bible after his encounter with Jesus, but tradition says he sailed to India in A.D. 52 to found some of the world’s oldest Christian churches. It shows what a doubter can do when his faith is renewed.

But – and one might sigh, Alas! – Jesus never appeared to Charles Templeton to invite him to feel his wounds. Templeton remained in doubt to the end of his life.

But Templeton’s words to Strobel remind us of something Frederick Buechner wrote in The Faces of Jesus:  “Doubts are the ants in the pants of faith. They keep it awake and moving.”

At the end of his life, Charles Templeton did not retract his doubt. But his words suggest he never lost the ants in his pants, either.

And whatever state his faith was in when he died, it is evident he never lost his fascination – or adoration – for Jesus, “the most important human being who ever existed.”

Jesus has that way of grabbing hold of one, even one who has never encountered his resurrected body or touched his wounds.

What does Thomas have in common with Charles the Doubter and all the other doubters-on-steroids who struggle to understand the secrets of the world?

We may have periods in our lives – long periods, endless periods, when we lose touch with God or Jesus.

But God’s Holy Spirit never lets go of us.

And whether we are able to speak the words or not, whether we know it or not, there will never be a time we are out of the loving presence of our Lord and our God.

____


He is Risen


April 20, 2025, Saint Barnabas Lutheran Church, Howard Beach, Queens, N.Y. Partially reprised from earlier posts. 

For the past several hours, the disciples have hidden in a darkened room, confused, grief-stricken, frightened. 

The central figure in their lives, Jesus of Nazareth, has snatched from them. They have watched his agony on the cross. They have watched him die. They may even have thought that their own lives are over. What could the future hold for them in the dangerous byways of Roman Palestine?

But now it’s Sunday morning. Mary Magdalene is the first to visit the tomb of Jesus. In one of the most moving stories in scripture, in John’s gospel, she encounters a man she assumes is the gardner. 

“Sir, if you have carried him away, tell me where you have laid him, and I will take him away.”

Jesus said to her, “Mary!” She turned and said to him in Hebrew, “Rabbouni!” (which means teacher.)

How quickly her grief turned to joy. 

But why didn’t she recognize him?

Perhaps Jesus was the last person she expected to see walking around a grave yard and her mind wasn’t focused on the man.

That could be. I once didn’t recognize my brother on an elevator because I didn’t expect to see him. The mind plays tricks on you.

But Mary was not the only apostle who didn’t recognize the resurrected Jesus.

In Luke 24, the resurrected Jesus joins two of his disciples on a walk to Emmaus, but Luke reports “their eyes were kept from recognizing him.” (v.16). Mark reports, a bit mysteriously, that Jesus appeared to them “in another form” (Mark 16:12), which, as author Garry Wills writes in What Jesus Meant, is “hard to interpret.”

In Luke 24:36b-48, the resurrected Jesus startles the disciples with an abrupt and unexpected appearance. 

He appears ghost-like through a solid wall.

But Jesus insists he is no ghost. He demonstrates the solidity of his flesh by eating fish. 

How does he do it? What is going on?

“Jesus appeared in numinous form (Wills writes) … his body was not the earthly body anymore, but one both outside time and space and affecting time and space.” 

The resurrected body of Christ could pass through walls and, ultimately, ascend into heaven, but Jesus could also allow Thomas to touch his wounds of crucifixion. Even more amazing, Jesus could eat with his companions. 

And now it is Easter and we’re still wondering. What was Jesus’ resurrected body really like?

We can’t get the question out of our minds because the Jesus we see moving in and out of the closing scenes of the Gospels is not the Jesus we thought we knew.

That Jesus was – how shall we put it? – a hale fellow well met. He was good company, a charismatic preacher and teller of tales, an imbiber of wines, a bon vivant. His enemies took advantage of his epicurean ways by calling him “a glutton and a drunkard, a friend of tax collectors and sinners.” (Matthew 11:19). When Jesus was offered the physical pleasures of a foot massage or a soothing anointing by a beautiful woman, he accepted. When a fruitless fig tree denied his impulse to nosh, he cursed it (Mark 11:20).

Jesus was so into the pleasures of the flesh that he made eating, drinking and foot washing mnemonics of his mission, lest any of us forget.

There are other things we know about the pre-resurrected Jesus. When anguished, he wept. When struck, he bled. When he met an obstacle, he had to go around it.

But in his post-resurrection period, so much about him is different. The dark circles of overwork have disappeared from beneath his eyes. His face seems younger, more relaxed. He looks like the old Jesus but he can make himself unrecognizable when it suits him. He somehow manages to walk through walls, but his body is corporeal enough to eat broiled fish. Even odder, the nail wounds of his crucifixion are visible, observable, touchable. He isn’t a ghost. He isn’t a zombie. Jesus’ resurrected body, which he defines in his own words as “flesh and bones,” is an unprecedented manifestation, a new state of being not seen since the dawn of creation.

We can’t stop wondering about it. We’re overflowing with questions we can’t wait to put before God. And one of those questions is, why did Jesus need a body? Wasn’t his soul’s immortality enough? Wasn’t it supremely liberating to shed his body and allow his spirit to fly free and unfettered for all eternity?

Let’s face it. The human body can be an uncomfortable thing to carry around with you, especially when it ages or falls ill. St. Francis of Assisi referred to his own body as “Brother Ass,” an obstinate encumbrance that led him into unspeakable temptations and had to be beaten into submission. Both Francis and St. Benedict, another mystic, punished their insubordinate bodies by throwing themselves naked into patches of thorns and writhing until they were suitably chastised and bleeding. Toward the end of his life, Francis concluded such behavior was patently nuts and began to protect his body to keep it well enough to labor, as a humble ass, in the vineyard of the Lord.

These old saints are nothing if not interesting, but you’ve got to wonder: if God placed enough value on Jesus’ scourged body to raise him from the dead, does it make sense for the rest of us to pillory our bodies with briar patches and humiliation?

C.S. Lewis, in Letters to an American Lady, said he understood what St. Francis meant by calling his body, “Brother Ass.”

Not that you and I have now much reason to rejoice in having bodies! [Lewis wrote]. Like old automobiles, aren't they? where all sorts of apparently different things keep going wrong, but what they add up to is the plain fact that the machine is wearing out. Well, it was not meant to last forever. Still, I have a kindly feeling for the old rattle-trap. Through it God showed me that whole side of His beauty which is embodied in colour, sound, smell and size. No doubt it has often led me astray: but not half so often, I suspect, as my soul has led it astray. For the spiritual evils which we share with the devils (pride, spite) are far worse than what we share with the beasts: and sensuality really arises more from the imagination than from the appetites; which, if left merely to their own animal strength, and not elaborated by our imagination, would be fairly easily managed.

For Lewis, the human body is as likely to steer us toward faith as it is to lead us into temptation.

There is a stage in a child’s life at which it cannot separate the religious from the merely festal character of Christmas or Easter [he wrote]. I have been told of a very small and very devout boy who was heard murmuring to himself on Easter morning a poem of his own composition which began ‘Chocolate eggs and Jesus riz.’ This seems to me, for his age, both admirable poetry and admirable piety. But of course the time will soon come when such a child can no longer effortlessly and spontaneously enjoy that unity. He will become able to distinguish the spiritual from the ritual and festal aspect of Easter; chocolate eggs will no longer seem sacramental. And once he has distinguished he must put one or the other first. If he puts the spiritual first he can still taste something of Easter in the chocolate eggs; if he puts the eggs first they will soon be no more than any other sweetmeat. They will have taken on an independent, and therefore a soon withering, life.”

The pleasures of the flesh may the succubae that lead us to sin, but they are just as likely to lead us to a more intimate experience of God. Olympic sprinter Eric Liddell preached that sermon in a single line in Chariots of Fire: “I believe God made me for a purpose, but he also made me fast. And when I run I feel His pleasure.”

There is no better instrument for detecting God than our bodies, even when they become old rattle traps. We feel God in the kiss of the sun on our backs, in the soothing caresses of a lover's hands on our shoulders, in the culinary pleasure of a good meal, in the relief of slaked thirst or the contentment of a good wine. As a lifelong Baptist, I like to fast before partaking in Episcopal or Lutheran Eucharist because the warmth of the wine fills my chest like a subtle indwelling of the Holy Spirit. And although our Baptist instincts tend to label rich, chocolaty desserts as “sinful,” I think of them as portals to heaven.

C.S. Lewis also believed that erotic pleasures were portals to heaven. Christianity’s embrace of sensuality – beginning with Jesus’ own fondness for food and drink – sets Christianity apart from other more ascetic religions and from  the heresies of Christians who believe God wants them to suffer, flagellate themselves or avoid earthly delights as a preparation for heavenly bliss. The body is a gateway, not a barrier to God, and the more people love one another, the better they will understand what heaven is like. “To love another person,” the chorus sings at the end of  Les Misérables, “is to see the face of God.”

But perhaps the definitive evidence that God created the body as a gateway rather than a temporary encumbrance is the resurrection of Jesus. Because Jesus’ soul, like ours, is immortal and indestructible, his eternal personality – like ours – was never in jeopardy. Mysterious as it is to us, God deemed that our bodies would be inseparable vessels for our souls and essential transoms for our insights into God’s truth.  The resurrection of Jesus seals the relationship between our body and our soul forever.

And just as important, the resurrection of Jesus seals God’s deal with us that we, too, will have the same experience.

Just how that will happen is unclear, and Christians have always wondered about it. Even in the beginning of the church, so many had doubts about it that Paul adopted a scolding tone:

How can some of you say there is no resurrection of the dead? If there is no resurrection of the dead, then Christ has not been raised; and if Christ has not been raised, then our proclamation has been in vain and your faith has been in vain … For if the dead are not raised, then Christ has not been raised. If Christ has not been raised, your faith is futile and you are still in your sins.” (I Corinthians 15:12-17)

I suspect the debate in Corinth was sparked by the same notions we have today. It’s easier to imagine our souls flitting around the firmament as disembodied spirits than it is to imagine our often infirm bodies raised to a new life. There are just so many unanswerable questions: what will our bodies look like? Will they be young again? Will they be better looking? And what about the bodies of persons who were dismembered at death? Will they, like Jesus, be resurrected with their scars intact? What about the victims of Hiroshima and Nagasaki whose bodies were broken down into atoms that melded with molecules of dust? What about persons whose cremains are scattered in several locations? How is the resurrection to take place?

Beats me.

You can spend hours in theological libraries or on the Internet, reading tomes and sermons about each of these issues, and many of them are exceedingly clever. Some surmise that our resurrected bodies will have no gender and cite the Pauline declaration that “in Christ there is no male nor female,” while others conclude optimistically that our resurrected and improved bodies will be spectacularly superior to our old shells.

Those answers will have to wait and may depend on whether our resurrected bodies are still curious.

But what is clear today is that God created our bodies to fulfill the destinies of our immortal souls, and Jesus affirmed it when his sudden appearance scared the disciples out of their wits. It seemed ghostly enough, but he said, “It is I myself. Touch me and see.”

The resurrection of Jesus that was witnessed and proclaimed by his followers is, as Winston Churchill said in another context, a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma.

Even more so is your resurrection, and mine.

But amid all the speculation and puzzlement, one fact emerges clearly enough: God proved his love for us in “that while we still were sinners, Christ died for us … For if while we were enemies, we were reconciled to God through the death of his Son, much more surely, having been reconciled, will we be saved by his life.” (Romans 5: 8-10).

Something extraordinary happened that Passover long ago that kept Jesus’ contemporaries returning worshipfully to the site of his crucifixion and inspired his disciples to risk their lives to keep his story alive.

How closely did Jesus’ numinous body resemble the body of the Jesus his disciples knew and loved? That’s hard to tell. As we have seen, Resurrected Jesus was often not recognized until he did something to call attention to himself. Only on rare occasions could the disciples actually touch him, and Jesus – when he chose to affect time and space – could eat food and – when he chose to be outside time and space – could disappear in front of their eyes.

What is that to us?

According to Paul, the numinous body of Jesus gives us a glimpse of our own numinous bodies when he shed our earthly shells.

“So it is with the resurrection of the dead; what is sown as a perishable thing is raised imperishable. Sown in humiliation, it is raised in glory; sown in weakness, it is raised in power; sown a physical body, it is raised a spiritual body.” (I Corinthians 15:42-44, REB)

What will our numinous bodies be like?

We hope, of course, that our resurrected bodies will be young, attractive, and more vigorous than the husk we carried through life.

But more than that, I think.

Our daughter Katie had a dear friend who, like her, was developmentally disabled on the autism spectrum. Joseph was a charming young man who, despite his limitations, was a loving and delightful presence in all our lives. He was a caring and giving person and I have no doubt he walked this earth exactly as God intended him to be.

When Joseph fell ill with leukemia, neither he nor Katie were fully able to understand what was happening. We loved him and when he died, we mourned him deeply.  

Not long after his death, I dreamed I was sitting at a table with a young man I slowly recognized as Joseph. He was relaxed and his eyes twinkled and we engaged in light conversation. It was only after I woke up that I realized Joseph and I were conversing at a level he could not have attained when he was alive, a conversation filled with humor and subtle nuance. He demonstrated insights and understandings that would have been beyond him.

I like to believe I was receiving an important message in that dream. I was introduced to Joseph as he will appear at his resurrection.

I certainly do not suggest that Joseph was incomplete when he lived among us, but there were many things his disability prevented him from understanding. But so it is with all of us: while we live on this earthly plain, there are many mysteries we will never comprehend. 

But the promise of Jesus is that God will restore us to a higher level of understanding when our own numinous live outside time and space but continue to experience the effects of time and space. 

Exactly how that will happen, as Professor Wills acknowledges, is “hard to interpret.” 

But for those who view death as an inevitable result of the time and space in which we are imprisoned, it’s good to be reminded that God transcends our earthly limitations.

Regardless of the forensic details, this is most certainly true:

The Creator God who loves us all unconditionally sent God’s son into the world to conquer death. Regardless of how God did it, Christ is raised. And because Christ is raised, so will we be raised.

We cling to this hope: that what has been sown in us in weakness will be raised in power.

Christ is Risen. Hallelujah.

Good Friday

 

April 18, 2025. Saint Barnabas Lutheran Church, Howard Beach, Queens, N.Y. Partially reprised from an earlier post.

Nothing displayed Roman power like crucifixion, an act designed
to publicly execute revolutionaries and slaves with utmost shame
and disgrace as a means of punishment, cruel amusement, and
deterrence for revolutionaries present and future.

In 71 BCE, when Spartacus was defeated by Pompey, six
thousand survivors of the revolt were crucified, lining the Appian
Way from Rome to Capua, a distance of more than 100 miles.
Josephus describes the crucifixion of thousands of Jews during
the siege of Jerusalem (70 CE) in the first war with Rome. “So the
soldiers, out of the wrath and hatred they bore the Jews, nailed
those they caught, one after one way, and another after another,
to the crosses, by way of jest, when their multitude was so great
that room was wanting for the crosses, and crosses wanting for
the bodies.”

For the readers of John, written in the traumatic aftermath of this
war and hurtling toward the cataclysmic second war (132–135
CE), the crucifixion of Jesus would be understood as a prophetic
foreshadowing and in profound solidarity with all those noncombatants
hungry for peace and life in the face of overwhelming
death. John takes Jesus’ crucifixion, intended by Rome as a
triumphant display of Roman power and glory over a humiliated
enemy, and narrates it as the victory of God over the forces of
death and dominion, a victory achieved by the self-controlled and
unflappable martyrdom of Jesus. Today, in yet another time of
war, famine, immense suffering, and death in Judea and
Palestine (and elsewhere), we do well to return to John’s Passion
for a renewed vision of peace, resilient agency, and life.

The lectionary passage begins under the cover of darkness with
the arrest of Jesus at the hands of soldiers from both Rome and
the chief priests and Pharisees highlighting the alliance of
powerful elites arrayed against Jesus.

Rejecting apprehension, Jesus offers himself in place of his
accompanying disciples, and he affirms the anti-violent path of
liberation given to him by God, rebuking Peter for his attack on
the high priest’s slave Malchus. We see clearly here John’s
insight that the power to overcome violence comes not from
violence, but rather from sacrificial love and from light that
eschews both flight and fight.

From there, Jesus (bound and beaten, yet ever unbowed) is
paraded before both high priests and Pilate, where his innocence
is interrogated and repeatedly pronounced.

Jesus’ confrontation with Pilate, the face of empire in Judea and
emissary of the imperial “ruler of this world”, displays most clearly
Jesus’ distinct path of liberation apart from violent revolution.
Jesus insists to Pilate, “My kingdom is not from this world. If my
kingdom were from this world, my followers would be fighting to
keep me from being handed over”. Rather, Jesus’ mission and
power is his testimony to the truth , a revelation that unmasks the
myth of violence and domination.

Jesus’ distinct path of liberation stands apart from the other
postures toward Rome displayed as foils in this passage. Though
united in their opposition to Jesus, we see starkly different
sentiments displayed by the various Jewish groups depicted. On
the one hand, we see the powerful chief priests aligned with
Roman rule, who go beyond sending officers to join the Roman
cohort at Jesus’ arrest to ultimately proclaiming, “We have no king
but the emperor”, an existential inversion of the zealous
revolutionary cry “No King but God!”

Conversely, the Judeans clamor for the release of Barabbas, the
anti-Roman insurrectionist. Though divided in causes, all three
parties (Pilate, the chief priests, and Judeans) are united in the
perception of the threat Jesus’ path to liberation and life poses to
them, a union begun in the raising of Lazarus that set in motion
their resolve to kill Jesus, and they join in sending him off to his
wrongful execution. Jesus, however, remains in control until the
end, pronouncing, “It is finished,” then bowing his head and
handing over his spirit.

Notably, though Jesus’ anti-violent resistance to the forces of
death is ultimately endorsed by God in the resurrection of Jesus
as the true way of faithfulness, his betrayal and crucifixion are
both condemned as sin, making clear that God neither requires
nor desires the death of Jesus to bring salvation. In addition to the
multiple metaphors of salvation in John (including spiritual union
with God and spiritual rebirth) John takes the death that Rome
intended for shame and dominion and transforms it into a sacred
sacrifice of liberation, evoking the Passover liberation by placing
Jesus’ crucifixion at the same time as the sacrifice of the lambs
for Passover.

The transformation of death into life is completed by the birth
imagery evoked in the eruption of blood and water when Jesus’
side is pierced. For all who struggle and die in pursuit of peace,
truth, and justice—especially peacemakers in Palestine, Israel,
and throughout the world—John’s portrait of Jesus’ martyrdom
shows the life, love, freedom, and rebirth that are possible in
active resistance.

Chrtistina Rosetti, a 19th century poet, places these words on our
hearts amid the darkness of Good Friday:

Am I a stone, and not a sheep,
That I can stand, O Christ, beneath Thy cross,
To number drop by drop Thy blood’s slow loss,
And yet not weep?
Not so those women loved
Who with exceeding grief lamented Thee;
Not so fallen Peter, weeping bitterly;
Not so the thief was moved;
Not so the Sun and Moon
Which hid their faces in a starless sky,
A horror of great darkness at broad noon –
I, only I.
Yet give not o’er,
But seek Thy sheep, true Shepherd of the flock;
Greater than Moses, turn and look once more
And smite a rock

Wash one another's feet. Seriously


April 17, 2025, St. Barnabas Lutheran Church, Howard Beach, Queens, N.Y. Reprised from an earlier post.

Six days before the Passover, Jesus came to Bethany …Then Mary took about a pint of pure nard, an expensive perfume; she poured it on Jesus’ feet and wiped his feet with her hair. And the house was filled with the fragrance of the perfume. John 12:1-3

This is one of four biblical accounts of a woman slouching toward Jesus to anoint his head or feet with very expensive oil. 

Every time I heard these stories discussed in Sunday church school, they were quickly divided into two categories:

One, how perceptive is the woman – in this case, Mary – to recognize Jesus as the Son of God; and, two, how shortsighted are the disciples (namely Judas) to look upon the act as a waste of money.

Whether it’s a waste or not, the oil with which Jesus is anointed is big money. Mary is pouring a year’s income worth of oil on Jesus. Judas, who sees many other ways the money could be used – including his own purse – is appalled. But Judas, the sly old grifter, hides his greed by complaining the money could have been given to the poor.

Jesus’ response is quoted in many legislative committees seeking to maintain a low minimum wage, or cut back on programs to supplement the income of families living below the poverty line, or redirecting taxes to benefit the rich at the expense of the poor.

“You always have the poor with you,” Jesus said, “but you don’t always have me.” (Jn 12:8)

We know, of course, that it’s ridiculous to assume Jesus is saying the poor are always here so we need to strategize how much money we should spend on them.

We know these walked among the poor, ate with the poor, cured their illnesses, and at all times identified with the poor.

Also, writes Lindsey S. Jodrey of Princeton Seminary, we may be interpreting Jesus’ words wrong.

“There’s a funny thing in ancient Greek, Jodrey points out.  “Sometimes the present indicative form of a word (which just indicates or states something — such as “you always have the poor with you”) matches the present imperative form of the word which commands you to do something … In this passage, which is translated ‘you will have’ can be indicative or imperative … it looks exactly the same. So maybe we should read Jesus’ statement not as an indication of the way things are, but as a command: Have the poor with you always. Or Keep the poor among you always.”

This is an important distinction because, God knows, the poor are with us, even in the richest country in the world.

According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, there are too many hungry children in our nation.

* 47.4 million people live in food-insecure households.

* 12.2 million adults live in households with very low food security.

* 7.2 million children live in food-insecure households in which children, along with adults, were food insecure.

* 841,000 children (1.2 percent of the Nation's children) live in households in which one or more child experienced very low food security.

In this passage, Jesus points out that the oil had been purchased “so that she might keep it for the day of my burial.” (Jn 12:7)

This adds a helpful dimension to what we might regard as a scene of extraordinary intimacy between a Palestinian man and woman. But maybe it’s not that, we tell ourselves, because preparing Jesus for his burial is a holy portent of what he will face in Jerusalem to bring his redemptive ministry to a close.

That was the approach I expected the Rev. James Martin, S.J., to take when he referred to the anointing stories during a recent lecture about his book Jesus: A Pilgrimage.

Instead, Martin asked: “Was Jesus turned on?”

Given that Jesus was equal parts God and human, it’s a fair question. And the answer is unavoidable: yes, no doubt. It’s one of the inescapable realities of Incarnational Theology. 

If Jesus the man was tempted in all things, his human hormones would have vied fiercely with his God side. As the woman’s shining face presses moistly toward him and he feels her warm breath on his weary feet, the God in him exults, “Bless you, dear child, for your chaste and pious devotion.” The human in him chokes back the words, “Come here often?”

It’s difficult for most of us to think of Jesus as being thoroughly human as well as wholly God. We can see the scriptural evidence that Jesus laughed, cried, hungered, enjoyed wine, and occasionally ate to satiation. Father Martin also points out that Jesus the Human must have suffered headaches, painful sunburn, blisters on his feet, episodes of projectile vomiting and violent diarrhea. He may also – since God is not known to have made a special dispensation for him – that he was sexually stimulated..

I may be crossing a line in stating my assumptions about just how human Jesus was. Indeed, I fear Mrs. Montfort, my childhood Sunday school teacher, would have been aghast to realize Jesus’ underarm odor carried the same pheromones as Mr. Montfort. But these are the challenging veracities of Incarnational Theology.

It’s difficult to face these realities and many congregations never acknowledge them. This may be one reason millennials (adults born after 1980) are leaving the church in droves. The Jesus we have tried to present to them is a two-dimensional Barbie Doll replete with pious promises but bereft of the human flesh that makes him credible as God incarnate. If Jesus didn’t battle with his hormones and his headaches the same way we do, how can we be sure that God really understands what it’s like to be us? 

It is undeniably difficult for many Christians to understand the union of body and soul. For one thing, it’s usually the body that causes people to sin so we try to keep it as far away from our souls as possible. 

This diminution of our physicality crops up in unexpected ways. A lot of us don’t like to think of our pastors, priests, nuns, or bishops as real humans because we expect them to be spiritual creatures.

When a pope gets sick, for example, it’s hard for the faithful to know how to pray. In the 1970s, when Pope Paul VI had his prostate removed, the actual procedure – whether retropubic or perineal – was too horrible to contemplate for a pope. Realizing the awkwardness of portraying the pope as a mere man with mere man maladies, the Vatican released as few details as possible.

In contrast, Pope Francis allowed the doctors to tell us everything about his illness, including the respiratory crisis when he inhaled his own vomit. In many ways, seeing the Pope as an old man struggling with illness and facing his mortality brought him closer to those who follow his lead.

An awareness of the humanity of Jesus greatly expands our appreciation of the Gospel stories.

Father James Martin does us a great service by reminding us that Jesus was human and “tempted in all things,” just as we are tempted. To know this is to know Jesus better, because we come to realize that Jesus knows what we go through every day: our pains and discomforts, our fears, our frustrations, and our perpetual temptations.

But, as theologians have also been reminding us for two millennia, Jesus differs from us in one all-important way: he never succumbed to temptation. He was a human without sin, a human who never strayed from God Creator or rejected God’s will for him.

That makes Jesus unique among all of God’s creation. 

Jesus struggled every day with the same temptations that that threaten to drown us. 

And in renewing our awareness of his humanness, we may find ourselves more powerfully drawn to his God-ness, and the eternal font of unconditional love. 

It also puts our own humanness and fleshly temptations in a clearer perspective.

C.S. Lewis wrote in Mere Christianity, “The sins of the flesh are bad, but they are the least bad of all sins.” 

Lewis wrote, “All the worst pleasures are purely spiritual: the pleasure of putting other people in the wrong, of bossing and patronizing and spoiling sport, and back-biting, the pleasures of power, of hatred. For there are two things inside me, competing with the human self which I must try to become. They are the Animal self, and the Diabolical self. The Diabolical self is the worse of the two. That is why a cold, self-righteous prig who goes regularly to church may be far nearer to hell than a prostitute.”

Of course, Lewis added, it’s better to be neither.

Jesus encouraged us by his own example to enjoy the pleasures of the flesh, if not its sins.

If that helps us become more generously loving and less diabolically priggish, we owe it to a deeper understanding of Jesus’ human side. The side that was more like us than we have dared imagine.


Tuesday, April 8, 2025

Hosanna

 


April 13, 2025, First Lutheran Church of Throggs Neck, Bronx, N.Y.

Shall we join Jesus’ long journey to Jerusalem in our mind’s eye, Ignatian style?

There you are, a wedding guest in Cana, raising another cup of the marvelous new wine. 

There you are on the mount, cupping your ears to hear the words of Jesus float down the hill.

There you are in the bustling crowd, watching as Jesus turns to heal a woman of her constant bleeding.

There you are in Gennesaret, where the sick were placed in market places on mats, and all who touched the hem of Jesus’ coat are healed.

There you are on the Mount of Transfiguration, blinded and dazed by Jesus’ sudden incandescence.

There you are at the tomb of Lazarus, speechless and 

Stupefied when Jesus’ summons the dead man to walk into the light of day.

And now, here you are in the midst of the crowds as Jesus enters Jerusalem. 

Close your eyes and imagine the crowds ripping fronds from the palm trees and waving them in jubilation. 

Listen to the people shouting their vociferous but, as it turns out, shallow hosannas. And watch as Jesus makes his way through the bustle of crowd, riding on an ass.

An ass? If you use your imagination to the fullest, this image alone will seem strange. Jesus, the Messiah, the son of God, riding on a silly beast of burden? And once that image is fixed anew in your mind's eye, your fancy may take you further than you have ever gone.

You may find yourself asking new questions. For example, why didn't Jesus walk?

And if he didn't walk, why ride on an ass? Why not a horse?

Most likely you will suppress that image quickly because most people have difficulty imagining Jesus on Trigger.

Perhaps Jesus chose not to walk because that would have placed him on the same level as everyone else, just another pilgrim in the dense Passover crowd. That would have made him virtually invisible unless he was a lot taller than everyone else, which - if so - was not mentioned in the gospels. If an average size Messiah required a triumphant entry into Jerusalem, he had to ride in on some conveyance that set him apart from the crowd. Strolling wouldn’t do it. A cart ride would have been silly. A chariot would have been out of the question. 

So why not a horse?

Horses don’t make a lot of appearances in the bible, unless they are the stuff of visions, such as the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse. But horses were surely common in Jerusalem and would easily overcome sheep and goats in the excremental sweepstakes. According to a cache of credible Internet information, riders of the Roman Equites Legionis were used as scouts, messengers, and defensive screens when soldiers were surrounded by overwrought Goths. Horses also served to make Roman officers look big and scary. 

Horses were beasts of war. Any king who rode a horse through the streets of an ancient city had either already conquered or was signaling his intention to take the city by force of arms.

This is hardly an image fit for the Prince of Peace.

In ancient times, the donkey was regarded as an animal of peace, and on the first Palm Sunday the pacific intentions of a king on a donkey were unmistakable to the teeming crowds.

The donkey also provided another advantage for Jesus. A person straddling a donkey attracts more attention than someone merely walking, but that person is not lifted too high above the crowd. Seated on a donkey, Jesus was accessible to the masses. They could reach out to touch him as he passed. The donkey permitted him to pass through the people as one of them, not as a king on a horse whose prancing hooves would frighten them out of the way. 

It’s obvious that Jesus had given careful thought to the sermon he wanted to preach by riding on the donkey. Somehow he knew a donkey had already been arranged for him in a suburb of Jerusalem before they entered the city.

When they were approaching Jerusalem, at Bethphage and Bethany, near the Mount of Olives, he sent two of his disciples and said to them, 

“Go into the village ahead of you, and immediately as you enter it, you will find a colt that has never been ridden; untie it and bring it. If anyone said to you, ‘Why are you doing this?’ just say this: ‘The Lord needs it and will send it back here immediately.’” (Mark 11:1-3)

One thing we might conclude by the promise to return the creature unscathed is that used donkeys do not depreciate in value during a test-drive.

Another thing we might conclude is that Jesus knew exactly how the sermon on the donkey would be remembered through the millennia. Neither a horse nor a stroll on foot would say it as clearly: here, on a humble ass, is the monarch of the universe, who was in the beginning with God, who took on human flesh to experience all the joys, pains and travails of humanity, who was one of us, who came to rescue us from sin, who came in peace to reconcile us with the God we had rejected.

It’s impossible to envision Jesus on the donkey and mistake him for a shock-and-awe conqueror. He rode on the ass through the streets of Jerusalem to say, my time is near. Raise your palms and spread your cloaks before me as signs you know who I am. Then depart in peace and ponder this revelation in your hearts. Leave the violence and flogging and crucifying to others.

Five days later, we know, the fickle frond wavers joined the vicious crowds to call for a brutal end to the sermon. They stood outside Pilate’s palace shaking their fists and chanting, “Crucify him.” 

It’s an excruciating story to hear every Passion Week, all the more so because it set a pattern of church brutality and carnage that has lasted to the present day. Even the peaceful donkey ride through Jerusalem was re-invented by the church as an opportunity for mayhem. According to another credible online source:

In the 16th and 17th centuries, Palm Sunday was marked by the burning of Jack-o-Lent figures. This was a straw effigy which would be stoned and abused. Its burning on Palm Sunday was often supposed to be a kind of revenge on Judas Iscariot, who had betrayed Christ. 

What a travesty of the sermon Jesus was preaching, but less a mockery than other incidents of church history: the Crusades, stake burnings, beheadings, disembowelments, and other hideous tortures of Christians who didn’t believe what the Christians in power believed. 

Christian persecution of Christians continued relentlessly throughout the centuries. The Mennonite Martyrs’ Mirror records countless examples of Christian-on-Christian cruelty. 

For example, a Mennonite named Dirk Willems who was jailed for heresy by his Dutch Lutheran neighbors in 1569, and sentenced to die. Willems escaped from jail and was hotly pursued by angry Lutherans, one of whom fell through thin ice and was about to drown. Willems, a true Christian to the end, stopped running and pulled the man to safety. It was just enough time for the crowd to catch up with him. They arrested Willems and burned him at the stake. 

No wonder we cannot repeat Tertullian’s Apology without snickering: “‘Look,’ they say, ‘how the Christians love one another, and how they are ready to die for each other.’” The quote is from an essay written in 200 C.E. And looking back, one wonders if it was ever true after that.

As we begin the last week of Lent, Passion Week, it will be good to reflect on these matters. Lent is a time of reflection and repentance. It’s a time to remind ourselves of the reasons Jesus came to us. It’s a time to recommit to the commandments Jesus said were the essential ingredients for human behavior: to love God with our heart, mind and soul, and to love our neighbors as ourselves.

Jesus expressed all of this in the simple symbolism of riding a donkey through the gates of Jerusalem. 

And as we watch him in our minds eye, making that astounding passage one more time, may we remember the message he intended.

And may our imaginations allow us to join the cheering crowds in that cleansing refrain:

Hosanna!

Blessed is the one who comes in the name of the Lord!

Blessed is the coming kingdom of our ancestor David!

Hosanna in the highest heaven!

Tuesday, April 1, 2025

Sensual Anointing

 


April 6, 2025, Saint Barnabas Lutheran Church, Howard Beach, Queens, N.Y.

Six days before the Passover, Jesus came to Bethany …Then Mary took about a pint of pure nard, an expensive perfume; she poured it on Jesus’ feet and wiped his feet with her hair. And the house was filled with the fragrance of the perfume. John 12:1-3

This is one of four biblical accounts of a woman slouching toward Jesus to anoint his head or feet with very expensive oil. 

Every time I heard these stories discussed in Sunday church school, they were quickly divided into two categories:

One, how perceptive is the woman – in this case, Mary – to recognize Jesus as the Son of God; and, two, how shortsighted are the disciples (namely Judas) to look upon the act as a waste of money.

Whether it’s a waste or not, the oil with which Jesus is anointed is big money. Mary is pouring a year’s income worth of oil on Jesus. Judas, who sees many other ways the money could be used – including his own purse – is appalled. But Judas, the sly old grifter, hides his greed by complaining the money could have been given to the poor.

Jesus’ response is quoted in many legislative committees seeking to maintain a low minimum wage, or cut back on programs to supplement the income of families living below the poverty line, or redirecting taxes to benefit the rich at the expense of the poor.

“You always have the poor with you,” Jesus said, “but you don’t always have me.” (Jn 12:8)

We know, of course, that it’s ridiculous to assume Jesus is saying the poor are always here so we need to strategize how much money we should spend on them.

We know these walked among the poor, ate with the poor, cured their illnesses, and at all times identified with the poor.

Also, writes Lindsey S. Jodrey of Princeton Seminary, we may be interpreting Jesus’ words wrong.

“There’s a funny thing in ancient Greek, Jodrey points out.  “Sometimes the present indicative form of a word (which just indicates or states something — such as “you always have the poor with you”) matches the present imperative form of the word which commands you to do something … In this passage, which is translated ‘you will have’ can be indicative or imperative … it looks exactly the same. So maybe we should read Jesus’ statement not as an indication of the way things are, but as a command: Have the poor with you always. Or Keep the poor among you always.”

This is an important distinction because, God knows, the poor are with us, even in the richest country in the world.

According to the U.S. Department of Agriculture, there are too many hungry children in our nation.

* 47.4 million people live in food-insecure households.

* 12.2 million adults live in households with very low food security.

* 7.2 million children live in food-insecure households in which children, along with adults, were food insecure.

* 841,000 children (1.2 percent of the Nation's children) live in households in which one or more child experienced very low food security.

In this passage, Jesus points out that the oil had been purchased “so that she might keep it for the day of my burial.” (Jn 12:7)

This adds a helpful dimension to what we might regard as a scene of extraordinary intimacy between a Palestinian man and woman. But maybe it’s not that, we tell ourselves, because preparing Jesus for his burial is a holy portent of what he will face in Jerusalem to bring his redemptive ministry to a close.

That was the approach I expected the Rev. James Martin, S.J., to take when he referred to the anointing stories during a recent lecture about his book Jesus: A Pilgrimage.

Instead, Martin asked: “Was Jesus turned on?”

Given that Jesus was equal parts God and human, it’s a fair question. And the answer is unavoidable: yes, no doubt. It’s one of the inescapable realities of Incarnational Theology. 

If Jesus the man was tempted in all things, his human hormones would have vied fiercely with his God side. As the woman’s shining face presses moistly toward him and he feels her warm breath on his weary feet, the God in him exults, “Bless you, dear child, for your chaste and pious devotion.” The human in him chokes back the words, “Come here often?”

It’s difficult for most of us to think of Jesus as being thoroughly human as well as wholly God. We can see the scriptural evidence that Jesus laughed, cried, hungered, enjoyed wine, and occasionally ate to satiation. Father Martin also points out that Jesus the Human must have suffered headaches, painful sunburn, blisters on his feet, episodes of projectile vomiting and violent diarrhea. He may also – since God is not known to have made a special dispensation for him – that he was sexually stimulated..

I may be crossing a line in stating my assumptions about just how human Jesus was. Indeed, I fear Mrs. Montfort, my childhood Sunday school teacher, would have been aghast to realize Jesus’ underarm odor carried the same pheromones as Mr. Montfort. But these are the challenging veracities of Incarnational Theology.

It’s difficult to face these realities and many congregations never acknowledge them. This may be one reason millennials (adults born after 1980) are leaving the church in droves. The Jesus we have tried to present to them is a two-dimensional Barbie Doll replete with pious promises but bereft of the human flesh that makes him credible as God incarnate. If Jesus didn’t battle with his hormones and his headaches the same way we do, how can we be sure that God really understands what it’s like to be us? 

It is undeniably difficult for many Christians to understand the union of body and soul. For one thing, it’s usually the body that causes people to sin so we try to keep it as far away from our souls as possible. 

This diminution of our physicality crops up in unexpected ways. A lot of us don’t like to think of our pastors, priests, nuns, or bishops as real humans because we expect them to be spiritual creatures.

When a pope gets sick, for example, it’s hard for the faithful to know how to pray. In the 1970s, when Pope Paul VI had his prostate removed, the actual procedure – whether retropubic or perineal – was too horrible to contemplate for a pope. Realizing the awkwardness of portraying the pope as a mere man with mere man maladies, the Vatican released as few details as possible.

In contrast, Pope Francis – who came near to death during his recent hospitalization – allowed the doctors to tell us everything about his illness, including the respiratory crisis when he inhaled his own vomit. In many ways, seeing the Pope as an old man struggling with illness and facing his mortality brought him closer to those who follow his lead.

An awareness of the humanity of Jesus greatly expands our appreciation of the Gospel stories.

Father James Martin does us a great service by reminding us that Jesus was human and “tempted in all things,” just as we are tempted. To know this is to know Jesus better, because we come to realize that Jesus knows what we go through every day: our pains and discomforts, our fears, our frustrations, and our perpetual temptations.

But, as theologians have also been reminding us for two millennia, Jesus differs from us in one all-important way: he never succumbed to temptation. He was a human without sin, a human who never strayed from God Creator or rejected God’s will for him.

That makes Jesus unique among all of God’s creation. 

Jesus struggled every day with the same temptations that that threaten to drown us. 

And in renewing our awareness of his humanness, we may find ourselves more powerfully drawn to his God-ness, and the eternal font of unconditional love. 

It also puts our own humanness and fleshly temptations in a clearer perspective.

C.S. Lewis wrote in Mere Christianity, “The sins of the flesh are bad, but they are the least bad of all sins.” 

Lewis wrote, “All the worst pleasures are purely spiritual: the pleasure of putting other people in the wrong, of bossing and patronizing and spoiling sport, and back-biting, the pleasures of power, of hatred. For there are two things inside me, competing with the human self which I must try to become. They are the Animal self, and the Diabolical self. The Diabolical self is the worse of the two. That is why a cold, self-righteous prig who goes regularly to church may be far nearer to hell than a prostitute.”

Of course, Lewis added, it’s better to be neither.

Jesus encouraged us by his own example to enjoy the pleasures of the flesh, if not its sins.

If that helps us become more generously loving and less diabolically priggish, we owe it to a deeper understanding of Jesus’ human side. The side that was more like us than we have dared imagine.


The Baptizer in Crisis

  December 14, 2025, Saint Barnabas Lutheran Church, Howard Beach, Queens, N.Y. It’s good that we keep Advent joy in our hearts because the ...