June 29, 2025, Saint Barnabas Lutheran Church, Howard Beach, Queens, N.Y.
Luke 9:51-62
In His Steps is a religious novel written in 1896 by Charles Monroe Shelton. It has sold more than 50 million copies and is one of the bestselling books of all time.
I read the novel in 1965 at the urging of some of my Southern Baptist Air Force friends. I was 19k, newly “Born Again,” and trying to live a Christian life despite powerful hormones surging in mybody. It was pointless to reason my way to appropriate Christian behavior because my frontal cortex would not be complete for another six years. This is why I found Charles Monroe Sheldon’s book so exciting, so helpful.
The full title of the book is, In His Steps, What Would Jesus Do? This is probably the origin of WWJD bracelets that proclaim one’s determination to ask what Jesus would do before making decisions. Would Jesus want me to patronize a restaurant that discriminates against LGBTQ+ persons? Would Jesus want one to stay in an abusive marriage? Would Jesus want me to pay Federal taxes that pay for weapons we give to countries that bomb civilians? Would Jesus want me to vote for a politician who believes in abortion? Would Jesus want me to invest in Tesla?
In our complicated era, the WWJD question is even more complicated. Would Jesus support war in Iran, Gaza, Ukraine? Would Jesus approve of the round-up of hundreds men, women, and children in the U.S., without due process, for immediate deportation to foreign lands? Millions on one side of the political divide shout, with certainty, “YES!” Millions more, including mainline religious leaders and Pope Leo XIV, shout, with equal certainty, “NO!”
Given this chasm of disagreement, it would probably be wise to hold back a little on deciding that we are absolutely sure Jesus would do. Sometimes Jesus surprises us and does what we don’t expect. It appears none of his disciples or followers expected Jesus to enter the Holy Temple and start throwing chairs, money boxes, and animal cages into the air.
In Luke 9:51-62, there is another dramatic turn in which the apostles expect Jesus to do one thing and he does another.
On his way to his final visit to Jerusalem, Jesus sends messengers ahead to a Samaritan village to “prepare for his arrival, but they did not receive him because his face was set toward Jerusalem.” (Lk 9:52-53)
Is this a surprise? Not according to the commentary in our Lutheran Study Bibles.
“On their way to Jerusalem, the center of the Jewish world, Jesus enters a Samaritan village. Jews and Samaritans had a strained relationship, stretching back to the time when the Assyrians and then the Babylonians attacked and conquered the people of Israel (722 BCE – 587 BCE, respectively.) Because of this, it is no surprise when the villagers do not welcome Jesus.”
But it was a surprise to the disciples. They were indignant – and just a little vengeful.
James and John had a shock-and-awe proposal.
“Lord, do you want us to command fire to come down from heaven and consume them?” (Lk 9:54)
Where in earth did they get that stupid idea? Was there any time in their three years with Jesus that he said or did anything remotely close to calling down fire on his opponents? Granted, he’s not always gentle Jesus meek and mild. But a fire storm? Please.
If James and John really expected fire, then they must have been surprised that Jesus wouldn’t do it. What Would Jesus Do? Not that.
He turned and rebuked them.
Luke leaves the nature of that rebuke up to our imaginations.
Did Jesus shake his head and heave a heavy sigh? Did he glare at them so fiercely their blood ran cold? Did he growl – as he has been known to say – “get behind me, Satan?” Or did he simply turn and lead the way to another village in silence?
The Rev. Dr. Chelsea Brooke Yarborough, Associate Director of Leadership Programming at the Association of Theological Schools, suggests Jesus’ response to having gates closed against him offers a “beautiful insight” on the nature of love.
The Samaritan village has every right to refuse Jesus entry. They are doing nothing wrong. They are protecting their people from the unknown. They have ever right to close their gates, and Jesus protects them when they do it.
“Jesus reminds us that allowing agency and choice is a crucial practice of love,” Brooke Yarborough writes. “He wanted to go there, and yet their boundary was honored and respected. What was not celebrated and seen as a good choice? The choice to punish, to harm, to destroy in the name of Jesus because the disciples were inconvenienced or thought another choice should have been made. Jesus shows us that allowing space for another to have agency is crucial to a life of love.”
These are important observations to contemplate before we ask ourselves, “What Would Jesus Do?”
James and John asked the question and immediately concluded Jesus would bring a hell storm down on this unpretentious little village. We must try not to forget this the next time we ask WWJD? Left to our own human devices, the answer we think we discern may be catastrophically wrong. And, not to put a fine edge on it, calamitously evil.
In college I began to steer away from the potential pitfalls of WWJD and use a different measure for living a Christ-like life.
Then at the very end of my senior year, I took my first course in philosophy under Dr. Peter Genco, a black-bearded mensch whose dissertation was rumored to have proven the existence of God. Among the text books we studied was Situation Ethics, The New Morality (1966, Westminster Press) by Joseph Fletcher. The book was, for me, an apotheosis of philosophical discovery because it offered an enticing formula to guide ethical behavior.
The greatest commandment of Fletcher’s domain was love. Ethical behavior was measured by the amount of love expended in the process. The more love you showed, the more ethical was your behavior.
The idea made ethics quantifiable and opened doors traditionally shut to nice Christians. I’m talking about sex.
Fletcher offered four situations in which ethical behavior might be contrary to conventional morality but would be okay depending on the amount of love you showed. The greater the amount of love, he said, the more ethical your behavior.
Given the hormones flushing through my 20-something arteries, the idea was most appealing.
One of the examples Fletcher cited involved Mrs. Bergmeier, a German woman sent to a prisoner of war camp in the Ukraine. Her husband, after rounding up the children, spent months in a desperate search for her. In the Ukraine, Mrs. Bergmeier learned that her family was looking for her but Soviet rules would not allow her to be released unless she was pregnant. A friendly camp officer graciously offered to help and before long the expectant Mrs. Bergmeier was released to her family.
That worked for me. Here was Mrs. Bergmeier and the generous camp officer, each loving their neighbor as themselves. And wasn’t this extra-marital coitus an expression of the purest kind of love?
But Professor Genco was having none of it. “Sex,” he said, “requires three magic words: ‘I take thee.’” Without a lifetime commitment to your partner, sex is a sin. So went the official line of the Eastern Baptist College faculty. But would it also be a sin for Mrs. Bergmeier to remain morally pure but separated from her children? Again, Fletcher doesn’t say. You tell me. It’s an ethical dilemma.
What Would Jesus Do?
It’s not easy to live a discerning life. For most of us, we try not to overthink our Christian behavior. Loving God, loving our neighbor, loving and forgiving our enemies, turning the other cheek – the life of faith is hard enough even when the rules are written down.
So we turn to the Holy Spirit to show us the way, to distil the rules of behavior to simple understandings. In The Imitation of Christ by Thomas à Kempis, we learn we cannot do it without one another. “God hath thus ordered it, that we may learn to bear one another’s burdens; for no man is without fault, no man without his burden, no man sufficient of himself, no man wise enough of himself; but we ought to bear with one another, comfort one another, help, instruct, and admonish one another.”
WWJD?
I no longer trust my conclusions about what Jesus would do in any circumstance because I may be wrong, and because Jesus often does what I don’t expect.
But I will ever trust the guidance of the Holy Spirit and the words of the Prophet Micah:
He has told you, O mortal, what is good,
And what does the LORD require of you
but to do justice and to love kindness and to
walk humbly with your God? [Micah 6:8]


